Young people with youth care combinations in kind; characteristics, region, 2015-2017

This table describes the number of different types of youth care received by young people in the reporting period. The various types of youth care may have taken place simultaneously and in succession. The persons can be broken down per combination of youth care types by personal characteristics and region of the responsible municipality according to the residence principle Youth. The addition of the number of young people over multiple forms of youth care within a (sub)total can be greater than the (sub)total itself. A young person may have multiple pathways with different forms of youth care, but for each form of care or (sub)total, a young person only counts once. Data available from 2015 to 2017 Section 4 provides more information on issues affecting comparability over time of the figures in this table. Status of the figures: All figures are final. New figures are no longer added due to discontinuation of this table. Changes as of 7 November 2018: This table has been discontinued. Changes as of 31 October 2018: The underlying encodings of the classifications used in this table for ‘Position in the household’ have been adjusted. These are now in line with the standard coding established by CBS. The structure and data of the table have not been modified. Changes as of 30 April 2018: — Except for the ‘household’ classification, the underlying encodings of the classifications used in this table have been adjusted. These are now in line with the standard coding established by CBS. The structure and data of the table have not been modified. — The terms autochtoon and immigrant have been revised. Instead, CBS is now talking about people with a Dutch or a migration background. Therefore, the designations of the classification have been adapted in this table and, if necessary, the underlying encodings. Changes as of 23 June 2017: The preliminary figures for 2016 have been corrected. Due to a technical error, the data of some youth care providers were not properly processed. The impact of this correction on the total number of youth assistance programmes and young people with youth assistance is minimal. In most cases, the differences are also negligible in the case of youth assistance and regions. Only in the South Limburg region in the form of ‘nursing care’ and ‘ambulatory assistance in the youth network’ are the effects greater, because the clients of the youth care providers in question live in that region in particular. When are new figures coming? None, this table has been discontinued. The table is largely followed up by table 'Youth with one or more forms of Youth Care; volume. See the link in paragraph 3.