2315|CITIZEN SECURITY AND VICTIMISATION (II)

— Issues that concern the Spaniards and the interviewee in particular. — Feeling of self-confidence. — Misfortunes for which he feels the most fear that they will happen to him. — Decision that you would take in the event of having, personally or your family, a certain amount of money. — Evolution in the last five years of different public services. — Evaluation of the operation of different private services. — Evolution of the problem of citizen insecurity in the last three years, in Spain and in its town or city. — Problems or situations in which you think when talking about citizen insecurity. — Scale of probability of being a victim of different crimes in your neighborhood. — Opinion on whether immigrants from less developed countries living in Spain have contributed to the increase in crime. — Main causes of crime today. — Attitude towards the legalisation of drugs. — Crimes for which he feels the most fear that they will happen to him personally. — Frequency with which different situations occur in your neighborhood. — Measures that you usually take to feel more secure. — Hiring a private security service. Type of service. Opinion on the ability to bear the cost of a security company for all citizens. — Phrase with which you agree more (in different pairs of sentences) about private security services. — Two aspects by which it would characterise private and public security services. — Opinion on the degree of security of different places or establishments. — Crimes suffered in the last year by people around the interviewee. — Self-perception of their predisposition to be a victim of crimes. — Crimes suffered in the last year by the interviewee: number of times, receipt of compensation (and institution or person who paid). — In case of having been the victim of robbery, pull or theft, recovery of the stolen goods. — If you have been the victim of intimidation or threats: knowledge of the person who threatened her and, if you know her, the type of relationship she has with her. — In case of having been the victim of any act of hooliganism, abuse or coercion by agents of the authority, physical assault, sexual abuse or rape: knowledge of the person who assaulted her and, if you know her, type of relationship she has with her. Receive some compensation (and institution or person who paid). — Reporting of the different types of crimes you have suffered: Force of Public Order/judgment before which he lodged the complaint. If it was before the National Police Corps, scale of assessment of different aspects of the service received. Reason not to report. — To those who have been victims of an attempted crime: how you've avoided this crime attempt. — Opinion on the frequency of domestic violence in Spanish families. — Reason why in the last year he has gone to a police station of the National Police. Assessment of the treatment received with respect to the expectations he had. Satisfaction with the care received. Evaluation scale of different aspects of the service received. If you have not had to attend in this last year: expectations of attention if I had to go. — Knowledge of the creation of the Proximity Police. — If you have seen a local policeman in your neighborhood: perception of the level of security since it is in the neighborhood, evolution of the number of crimes and opinion about the perception that the neighbors have of this Proximity Police. Kind of relationship you've had with a proximity policeman. — Services or activities that you would like the Proximity Police to develop. — Knowledge of the implementation of a unique telephone number for any kind of emergency. Knowledge of the telephone number and use of it.Comparison of the effectiveness of this number compared to the traditional 091, 092, etc. — Number of times you have called 091 in the last year, reason for the last call. Evaluation of the treatment received, compared to the expectations I had. Degree of satisfaction with the care received. Scale of satisfaction with different aspects of the service received. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Vote recall in March 1996 general elections.