2455|INSTITUTIONS AND AUTONOMIES (II)

— Main problems that exist in Spain and its autonomous community. — Assessment of the political and economic situation of Spain and its autonomous community. Comparison of the economic and political situation 3 years ago in its autonomous community. — Degree of interest in the national policy, that of its autonomous community and that of its municipality. — Opinion on the influence that, on the personal well-being and of his family, have the decisions of the Central, Autonomous and Municipal Government. — Form of organisation of the State with which it agrees most. — Degree of autonomy you would like for your autonomous community. — Degree of agreement with different phrases on the influence of the State of Autonomies. — Evaluation of the influence of the creation and development of the State of Autonomies for Spain. — Evaluation of the functioning of the State of Autonomies during these years. — Degree of satisfaction with the functioning of its autonomous community. — Opinion on the attitude that the Autonomous Government should adopt in the event of discrepancy with the Central Government. — Opinion on the type of current relationship between the Autonomous Government and the Central Government. — Assessment of the state of the current relations between the Central Government and that of its community. — Assessment of the existence of differences in prosperity and wealth between the autonomous communities. Autonomous community in which it believes that you live better and the one that lives worse. — Opinion on the influence of the creation of the autonomous communities on the differences of prosperity and wealth between the different regions. Evolution in the coming years. — Assessment of the policy followed by the Autonomous Government in terms of: housing, citizen security, education, unemployment, infrastructure, agriculture and fisheries, health, environmental protection, operation of public transport, industry and commerce and regional administration. Opinion on the evolution of these issues over the past three years. — Evaluation of the level of information it has on the activities carried out by the Autonomous Government, the Parliament of its autonomous community and its City Council. — Evaluation of the management carried out by the Autonomous Government and the opposition in these last 3 years. — Opinion on the degree to which the Autonomous Government has demonstrated: ability to defend the interests of the autonomous community, honesty, capacity for dialogue, efficiency, ability to communicate with street people, knowledge of the problems of the autonomous community. — Approval of the work of the current Autonomous Government. Opinion on the situation in the event that the opposition was at the head of the autonomous community. — Evaluation of the work they carry out: the City Council, the Autonomous Parliament, the Parliament of the Nation, the Autonomous Government and the Central Government. — Opinion on the functioning of the offices and public services managed by its autonomous community compared to those managed by the Central Administration and its City Council. — Opinion on which administration best treats its citizens: its City Council, its Autonomous Administration or the Central Administration. — Evaluation of the management carried out in the last three years by the President of his autonomous community. Discharge and degree of confidence. — Opinion on the differentiated vote to parties depending on the type of call, regional or general, that is concerned. — Degree of closeness he feels towards the different political parties. — Term he prefers to refer to his autonomous community. — Scale of regionalist and nationalist sentiment. — Regionalist sentiment. — Intention to vote in regional and general elections. Sympathy for political parties. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Scale of political ideology applied to political parties. — I remember voting in the previous general and regional elections. Vote fidelity and electoral volatility. — Autonomous community of birth of the interviewee and his parents. — Frequency of attendance at religious offices.