2642|DEBATE ON THE STATE OF THE NATION (XVIII)

— Knowledge of the holding of the debate on the state of the nation. — Opinion on the degree of interest these debates have for people. — Opinion on whether these debates deal with the issues that really concern Spaniards today. — Opinion on the usefulness of these parliamentary debates. — Frequency of political information by different media. — Media, television or radio, which has followed the development of the debate. Reason why he has not followed the debate, if any. — Degree of interest in the follow-up to the debate. — Main topics that have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the extent to which issues that concern Spaniards have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the degree of conflict of the debate. — Evaluation of the interventions in the debate of different political leaders. — Degree of agreement with the statements of: José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Mariano Rajoy, Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida, Joan Puigcercós, Josu Erkoreka, Gaspar Llamazares, Joan Herrera, Paulino Rivero, Francisco Rodríguez, José Antonio Labordeta, Begoña Lasagabaster, Uxue Barkos, Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba. — Opinion on the degree to which the President of the Government, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has transmitted to Spanish society confidence in the economic and political future, decision to fulfill the electoral promises and strength of the Government and firmness of its decisions. — Opinion on the degree to which Mariano Rajoy has transmitted to Spanish society the message that the PP has real proposals against government policy, is capable of constructive opposition, is capable of instilling trust in Spanish society and is prepared to assume the government of the country. — Opinion on whether José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy demonstrated in the debate: knowledge and sensitivity to the country’s problems, moderation, practicality, ability to communicate with street people, ability to fit criticism and political initiative. — Opinion on which politician has won the debate. — Evolution of the image of political leaders after the debate. — Opinion on developments in the political and economic situation after the debate. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Remembrance of vote in the general elections of March 2004.