2841|PUBLIC OPINION AND FISCAL POLICY (XXVII)

— Nationality of the interviewee. — Frequent talk of the functioning of public services. — Satisfaction with the operation of the various public services: education, health, citizen security, justice and infrastructure. — Phrase that best expresses its opinion on taxes: they are a means of distributing wealth, it is an obligation imposed by the State is not well known in exchange for what or, are necessary for the State to provide public services. — According to the opinion of whether it is preferable to raise or lower taxes to spend more or less on social benefits and public services. — Consideration received by society in general and the interviewee and his family in particular for the payment of taxes and contributions to the State. — Assessment of the amount of resources the State devotes to: education, public works, unemployment protection, defence, citizen security, health, culture, housing, justice, pensions and social security, transport and communications, environmental protection, development cooperation and research in science and technology. — According to the opinion that it is necessary to increase taxes to improve social services and benefits or with the opinion that it is possible to reduce taxes and maintain these services. — Assessment of the degree of responsibility of Spaniards when fulfilling their duties and obligations as citizens. Degree of personal responsibility. — Valuation of the amount of taxes that Spaniards pay, and comparison with other countries in Europe. — Justice in the distribution of tax payments. — Justice in the collection of taxes and tax burden among those who have high, medium or reduced incomes. — Tax fraud that currently exists in Spain and its effect. — Assessment of the efforts of the Administration in the fight against tax fraud. — Opinion on the number of people who defraud in the income return. — Opinion on the amount of fraud in the VAT return. — According to various phrases on the consequences of tax fraud: it is deceived out of fear of a review, almost everyone cheats, defrauding does not harm anyone, and deceiving other citizens is deceived. — Tax that would dislike more/less if it went up: Income tax or VAT. — Preference between raising or lowering taxes to spend on social benefits and public services. — Obligation to file the Income Declaration this year. Balance of this year’s income declaration. Ticked box for percentage allocation. Probability of a tax inspection of the Income Declaration to the interviewee. — Inspection of the income declaration in the last five years, and probability that it will be done in the coming years. Result of the inspection. — Self-location on a scale (1-10) of wealth. Location of parents and children on the same a scale of wealth. — Valuation (0-10) of the reasons for obtaining an economic position: effort and education or family origin and contacts. — Assessment (0-10) of the increase in taxes to have better public services and social benefits, personal preference and political parties. — Self-definition of their political ideology. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Participation and remembrance of vote in the general elections of March 2008. — Situation of coexistence. — Possession of children, their ages, type of school to which they go and if they are awarded scholarships. — Type of health service, public or private, that you use. — Housing tenure regime. — Type of school during primary school and enjoy scholarship during the interviewee’s studies. — Religious practice. — Assessment of the personal economic situation. — Valuation of personal income.