Dataset information
Available languages
Spanish
Keywords
Administración y servicios públicos, Hacienda Pública y política fiscal, Estudio Cuantitativo
Dataset description
— Nationality of the interviewee.
— Frequent talk of the functioning of public services.
— Satisfaction with the operation of the various public services: education, healthcare, pensions, administration of justice, citizen security, social services, public transport, public works and assistance to dependents.
— Phrase that best expresses its opinion on taxes:
they are a means of distributing wealth, it is an obligation imposed by the State is not well known in exchange for what or, are necessary for the State to provide public services.
— Consideration received by society in general and the interviewee and his family in particular for the payment of taxes and contributions to the State.
— Assessment of the amount of resources the State devotes to:
education, public works, unemployment protection, defence, citizen security, health, culture, housing, justice, pensions and social security, transport and communications, environmental protection, development cooperation, research in science and technology and assistance to dependent people.
— Valuation (0-10) of the increase in taxes to have better public services and social benefits.
— Assessment of the degree of responsibility of Spaniards when fulfilling their duties and obligations as citizens.
Degree of personal responsibility.
— Scale of importance (0-10) that gives different attitudes to consider someone as a good citizen:
to be supportive, to vote, not to evade taxes, to comply with the laws, to respect opinions, to be honest.
— Valuation of the amount of taxes that Spaniards pay, and comparison with other countries in Europe.
— Preference for collection through direct or indirect taxes (IRPF/VAT).
— Justice in the distribution of tax payments.
— Tax fraud that currently exists in Spain, reasons and effects.
— Level of people who do not declare all their income on income tax return or VAT.
— According to various phrases on the consequences of tax fraud:
it is deceived out of fear of a review, almost everyone cheats, defrauding does not harm anyone, and deceiving other citizens is deceived.
— Assessment of the efforts of the Administration in the fight against tax fraud.
— It is important that European countries take joint measures to prevent tax evasion or evasion.
— Obligation to file the Income Declaration this year.
Balance of this year’s income declaration.
Ticked box for percentage allocation.
Likelihood of having a check-up.
— Scale of valuation (0-10) of the reasons for achieving a certain economic position.
— Self-definition of their political ideology.
— Scale of political ideology of the interviewee.
— Participation and remembrance of vote in the general elections of March 2011.
— Marital status and situation of coexistence.
— Possession of children, their ages, type of school to which they go and if they are awarded scholarships.
— Type of health service, public or private, that you use.
— Housing tenure regime.
— Status of beneficiary of social benefits at present or the last 4 years.
— Type of school during primary school and enjoy scholarship during the interviewee’s studies.
— Religious religiosity and practice.
— Assessment of the personal economic situation.
— Household and personal income level.
— Occupation and branch of activity of the father and mother when the person interviewed was 16 years old.
— Moment of acquisition of Spanish nationality.
Level of knowledge of Spanish of the interviewee and attributed by the interviewer.
Build on reliable and scalable technology