3016|DEBATE ON THE STATE OF THE NATION (XXIV)

— Knowledge of the holding of the debate on the state of the nation. — Opinion on the degree of interest these debates have for people. — Opinion on whether these debates deal with the issues that really concern Spaniards today. — Opinion on the usefulness of these parliamentary debates. — Frequency of monitoring of the policy. — Media, television, radio or Internet, which has followed the development of the debate. Reason why he has not followed the debate, if any. — Degree of interest in the follow-up to the debate. — Predominant style in the speeches of the debate. — Main topics that have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the extent to which issues that concern Spaniards have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the degree of conflict of the debate. — Assessment of the interventions in the debate of different political leaders and degree of agreement with the statements of: Mariano Rajoy, Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba, Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida, Cayo Lara, Joan Coscubiela, Chesús Yuste, Rosa Díez, Aitor Esteban, Xabier Mikel Errekondo, Alfred Bosch, Pedro Quevedo, María Olaia Fernández Dávila, Joan Baldoví Roda, Enrique Álvarez Sostres, Uxue Barkos, Carlos Salvador and Alfonso Alonso. — Opinion on the degree to which the President of the Government, Mariano Rajoy has transmitted to Spanish society confidence in the economic and political future, decision to fulfill the electoral promises and strength of the Government and firmness of its decisions. — Opinion on the degree to which Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba has transmitted to Spanish society the message that the PSOE has real proposals in the face of government policy, is capable of constructive opposition, is capable of instilling confidence in Spanish society and is prepared to assume the government of the country. — Opinion on whether Mariano Rajoy and Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba demonstrated in the debate: knowledge and sensitivity to the country’s problems, moderation, realism, practicality, ability to communicate with street people, ability to fit criticism and political initiative. — Opinion on which politician has won the debate. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Voter turnout and recall in the November 2011 general elections.