3329|CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH IN THE FACE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

—Risk of poverty of different population groups in Spain. —Scale of poverty (1-10) of the person interviewed and their environment before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. —Percentage of children under 18 and young people between 18 and 34 who live in poverty in different territorial areas. —Degree of importance of situations that explain poverty in Spain. —Grade according to different opinions on poverty in Spain. —Reasons that explain the poverty of families in Spain. —Frequency with which children in poverty experience various situations. —Grade of usefulness of measures to alleviate child poverty in Spain. —Level of responsible administration in the fight against child poverty. —Increased social inequality due to the COVID-19 pandemic. —The main problem of young people before and during the pandemic. —Consequences that the COVID-19 pandemic will produce among young people. —Assessment of the social position of young people. —Causes of the social position of young people. —Assessment of whether the State/public administrations help young people. — Measures by public administrations to help young people. —Expectation of the well-being of young people with respect to their parents before and during the pandemic. —The degree of interest of young people in politics in a situation of pandemic and economic crisis. —Grade according to phrases about young people during the pandemic. —Opinion on whether young people should have their opinion in decision-making on issues that affect them. —Defining idea of the role of young people in Spain today. —Assessment of the economic and social situation of young people in Spain as a result of the pandemic in relation to other similar countries. —Assessment scale (1-10) on the commitment of national political parties in relation to inequality and poverty. —Electoral participation in the general elections of November 2019. —Remember vote in the November 2019 general election of voters. —Political party that considers closer to his ideas. —Schooling and level of studies achieved by the person interviewed. —Religiosity of the person interviewed and frequency of attendance at religious offices. —Civil status of the person interviewed. —Personal situation of current coexistence. —Work situation of the person interviewed. —Occupation of the person interviewed. — Professional situation of the person interviewed. —Scale of ideological self-location (1-10). —Subjective social class of the person interviewed.