A decision framework to attribute atmospheric nitrogen deposition as a threat to or cause of unfavourable habitat condition on protected sites
Open data API in a single place
Provided by Government Digital Service
Get early access to A decision framework to attribute atmospheric nitrogen deposition as a threat to or cause of unfavourable habitat condition on protected sites API!
This report describes the development of a decision framework to provide a means of attributing nitrogen deposition as a threat to, or cause of, unfavourable habitat condition on protected sites.
The UKâs semi-natural habitats exceed their atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition critical load ranges across much of their area, and survey data suggests there are adverse impacts of this excess N deposition. However, information from Common Standards Monitoring (CSM) of protected sites does not appear to identify N deposition as a potential cause of unfavourable condition at many sites. A decision framework was developed to provide a means of attributing N deposition as a threat to, or cause of, unfavourable habitat condition on protected sites. The framework provides a practical methodology for assessing the impacts of N deposition on protected sites in an objective way, which was previously lacking. It is based on a sound conceptual approach, and is both robust and flexible enough to cope with additional information.
The framework is described in the main report, whilst the detailed methodology is included in the supporting annexes.
* Annex 1: Strength of âtheoretical/nationalâ evidence (Work Package 1 report) â this describes in detail the scoring of national/theoretical evidence to derive an Exceedance Score.
* Annex 2: Strength of site-based evidence (Work Package 2 report) â this describes in detail the site-based evidence used to derive a score for strength of site-based evidence (Factor 2)
* Annex 3: Matrix design, testing and recommendations (Work Package 3 report) â this describes the version of the matrix as recommended by the contractors, provides recommendations for future work (the key recommendations from this are summarised in this main report), and briefly describes the testing undertaken as part of Work Package 3.
The accompanying zipped folder includes:
* Factor 1 spreadsheet (Exceedance Score) â this spreadsheet incorporates the elements of WP1 which generate the exceedance score for each CSM habitat (and sub-habitat) based on a user-defined deposition; guidance for utilising the spreadsheet is given in Annex 1.
* Factor 2 spreadsheets (N indicators) â these spreadsheets display the results of a review of all targets for each CSM habitat and the identification of strong and weak N indicators; guidance for the spreadsheets is given in Annex 2.
* Final assessment matrix â this Word Document provides a copy of the final assessment matrix.
Build on reliable and scalable technology
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Some basic informations about API Store ®.
Operation and development of APIs are currently fully funded by company Apitalks and its usage is for free.
Yes, you can.
All important information such as time of last update, license and other information are in response of each API call.
In case of major update that would not be compatible with previous version of API, we keep for 30 days both versions so you will have enough time to transfer to new version. We will inform you about the changes in advance by e-mail.