On the alignment of academic publishers' embargos with H2020 requirements - Dataset

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Zenodo

Get early access to On the alignment of academic publishers' embargos with H2020 requirements - Dataset API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
2020.01.24 00:00
Created
2016.06.13
Available languages
English
Keywords
Open Science, Open Access
Quality scoring

Dataset description

-- ATTENTION PLEASE: RIGHT NOW THE DATASET IS UNDER INDEPENDENT DOUBLE CHECK TO TEST THE PRESENCE OF POSSIBLE ERRORS : PLEASE CONTACT THE AUTHOR FOR FURTHER INFO --   This dataset refers to the breifing paper "On the alignment of academic publishers' embargos with H2020 requirements"  (https://nexacenter.org/nexacenterfiles/WoS-Romeo-analysis%20APS-final.pdf) published in the ambit of the European project Pasteur4OA (http://www.pasteur4oa.eu/).   We wanted to understand how the publishing behaviour of EU researchers might be affected by the H2020 policy requirement to ensure Open Access (OA) to all articles from EU-funded projects within 6 months for science and engineering projects and 12 months for humanities and social science studies. Many publishers impose an embargo on 'Green' Open Access, where researchers deposit their articles in repositories, and these embargoes can be longer than the maximum permitted by the H2020 policy. The issue was whether researchers may have to alter their publishing behaviour or can they continue to publish in journals of their choice and still comply with the H2020 requirements. The following research questions were posed: 1) What is the level of compliance of current publishers' embargo policies with the H2020 requirements? 2) How many journals are compliant with the H2020 requirements? The overall findings were that 90% of publishers used by EU researchers to publish their work and 94% of articles published by EU researchers are compatible with the H2020 Open Access policy requirements. Our conclusion is that only in a small minority of cases – 5-10% – would EU researchers' normal publishing behaviour run contrary to H2020 rules.    The zip file containing the data used, divided by access to the post-prints:  - ok Open Access - no Open Access - unclear - OA with restrictions, but compliant to H2020 - OA with restrictions, not compliant to H200 - OA with restrictions, not clear The data model is available on the paper (https://nexacenter.org/nexacenterfiles/WoS-Romeo-analysis%20APS-final.pdf)
European data infrastructure with broad catalog discovery, free evaluation access and production-grade API options.
190K+
indexed dataset pages
32
countries and EU institutions
2019
API-first since
Free API quota
for evaluation and prototypes
SLA
history and push on production APIs
FAQ

Questions before production use

Practical answers on evaluation, licensing, freshness, versioning and support.

api.store is built and operated by Apitalks s.r.o. Company details and a direct contact path are linked in the footer for vendor checks and procurement review.
Yes. Selected APIs include a free API quota, so your team can validate coverage, freshness, response shape and workflow fit before asking for a production plan.
Often yes, but usage rights depend on the source license and dataset. We surface source, license and update metadata where available, and can help review terms before a production integration.
Maintained APIs include update metadata where available. For production integrations, we can add history, monitoring and push updates so changes are easier to detect and act on.
Production APIs can add SLA, stable identifiers, versioning support, history, push updates and direct support around the data your product or AI workflow depends on.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

European data discovery with free evaluation access and production-grade API options.

Copyright © 2026. Made by Apitalks