National Parks & Wildlife Service Woodland Releves

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Heritage Council

Get early access to National Parks & Wildlife Service Woodland Releves API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
2026.04.07 15:03
Created
2025.07.25
Available languages
English
Keywords
heritage council, national parks & wildlife service woodland releves, environment, coastal heritage, habitats and biotopes
Datasource
Not available
Quality scoring

Dataset description

This dataset is owned and provided by NPWS. Reccomended reading at; http://www.npws.ie/en/media/NPWS/Publications/Reports/Media,6688,en.pdf Botanical, Environmental & Conservation Consultants Ltd (2008): National Survey of Native Woodlands 2003-2008 - Volume I (Draft). A report submitted to the National Parks & Wildlife Service 2.3 Relevé survey A 10 m x 10 m relevé was recorded for each of the vegetation communities identified within surveyed sites. Cover in vertical projection for all vascular and bryophyte species was recorded on the Domin scale (Kent & Coker 1992), as were other general parameters (Appendix 2). The presence of notable lichen species was recorded. For each relevé a 10-figure grid reference was obtained using a GPS and altitude, slope, and aspect were recorded. Soil profiles were examined to a depth of at least 30 cm and classified to Great Soil Group (Gardiner & Radford 1980). Five soil samples were taken from each relevé (one from the centre and one from each quadrant) with an aluminium soil corer to a depth of 10 cm, and bulked. Soil pH was measured in the field (or immediately on return from the field) using a glass electrode and a 1:1 soil / water paste. Soil samples were then air-dried, crumbled and stored for subsequent laboratory analyses of loss on ignition and total phosphorus. Loss on ignition was determined by heating samples to 500 ºC for 5 hours. To estimate total phosphorus, samples were digested using the Kjeldahl method and phosphorus determined using a molybdenum blue complex by spectrophotometer. Within each 10 m x 10 m relevé, tree size, abundance and stem quality were measured. The species and number of all stems with a dbh <7 cm were recorded in each relevé using five height classes – a simplified version of Raunkier’s scheme (Raunkier 1934). Differentiation was made between stems which were basal shoots of mature trees and those which were not (free regeneration). As the density of trees varies greatly between woodlands, the plot size for assessment of mature trees (dbh _7 cm) was increased as required beyond the relevé to allow a statistically representative sample of c. 30 trees to be recorded. Each mature stem was given a tree number with multiple stems from the same tree sharing the same tree number. This permitted account to be made for typically multi-stemmed species, such as hazel, in subsequent density calculations. For each stem the following information was recorded: _ Species _ Dbh _ Crown position relative to other trees was recorded in four classes: Dominant (trees emerging from the general canopy level) Co-dominant (trees forming the canopy) Intermediate (trees in the lower canopy receiving some direct light from above) Suppressed (trees completely overtopped by the canopy) _ Height (to the nearest metre) For trees of minimum merchantable size (dbh >40 cm; Joyce 1998) the following additional data were recorded: _ Estimated log length – total length, in metres, of the portion of the main stem that was suitable for veneer or sawtimber _ The presence of the following stem defects: forks, heavy branches, stem galls/cankers, kinks/bends, damaged stem/bark, lean >10%, fluted/buttressed bole, excessive taper, shelf fungi or other stem disease, excessive ivy, epicormic shoots. Within the relevé, the stratification of the woodland was sketched and photographed and the height and percentage cover for each stratum (canopy, sub-canopy and shrub layer) recorded. All photographs were stored digitally.
European data infrastructure with broad catalog discovery, free evaluation access and production-grade API options.
190K+
indexed dataset pages
32
countries and EU institutions
2019
API-first since
Free API quota
for evaluation and prototypes
SLA
history and push on production APIs
FAQ

Questions before production use

Practical answers on evaluation, licensing, freshness, versioning and support.

api.store is built and operated by Apitalks s.r.o. Company details and a direct contact path are linked in the footer for vendor checks and procurement review.
Yes. Selected APIs include a free API quota, so your team can validate coverage, freshness, response shape and workflow fit before asking for a production plan.
Often yes, but usage rights depend on the source license and dataset. We surface source, license and update metadata where available, and can help review terms before a production integration.
Maintained APIs include update metadata where available. For production integrations, we can add history, monitoring and push updates so changes are easier to detect and act on.
Production APIs can add SLA, stable identifiers, versioning support, history, push updates and direct support around the data your product or AI workflow depends on.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

European data discovery with free evaluation access and production-grade API options.

Copyright © 2026. Made by Apitalks