Species point records from 1989 FSCRC Lavan Sands littoral cockle dredging study

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Joint Nature Conservation Committee

Get early access to Species point records from 1989 FSCRC Lavan Sands littoral cockle dredging study API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
Created
Available languages
English
Keywords
Quality scoring

Dataset description

The effects of intensive hydraulic cockle dredging during one tidal cycle on the sediment and infaunal community compostion of two areas of sediment flat were studied during the period June 1989 - January 1990. The 2 areas selected for the study were on the mid-shore of Lavan Sands, N Wales and on the mid-shore of Blackshaw Flats, Solway Firth. The infaunal community of the Lavan Sands (LS) sites were dominated by the cockle C. edule, the baltic tellin shell M. balthica, the lugworm A. marina and the amphipod C. arenarium, with a variety of small polychaetes and other infaunal species. The infaunal community of Blackshaw Flats (BF) sites was less diverse, and dominated by cockles, baltic tellin shells and the small snail H. ulvae, with a variety of other small infaunal species. 6 sites were established in each area, 3 to act as controls for the 3 experimental sites which were dredged during one tidal cycle during June (LS) or July (BF). The sites were sampled for infaunal and sedimentological analyses on the day before dredging and then one day, one week, 3 months and 6 months after dredging. The data were analysed with the aid of a variety of statistical and graphical techniques. Prior to dredging, there was only a smally variability between the sediment characteristics of the 6 sites, at both LS and BF. However, the abundances of many infaunal species varied significantly between sites and between the control and experimental areas, particularly at LS. This is considered to be due extreme patchiness in the distribution patterns of the infauna, rather than to differences in the environmental characteristics of the sites. Comparison of the experimental sites the day before and the day after dredging found very few differences in sediment characteristics, although there was a small but significant increase in the mean grain size of the sediment at BF. There was no significant difference in the precentage mud content. Immediate effects on the infauna at LS were considerable, with significant reductions in the abundances of most species. The total number of recorded taxa dropped from 27 the day before to 20 the day after. The mean abundance of all individuals was reduced from 7,000 to 3,300 per squ. m, while the precentage reduction in abundance of most individual species was around 50%. However, at BF the effects were less dramatic, with significant reductions of only one species H. ulvae, reduced from a mean abundance of 3.313 to 1.293 per squ. m. Analysis of seasonal trends at all sites over the 6 months after dredging found that the sediment characteristics showed very little variation at either LS or BF. The percentage organic matter of the LS sites did show a small but significant reduction from summer to winter, at both the control and experimental sites. Seasonal variations in the fauna, however, were significant for most species, and at LS there was a peak in the abundance of most species in the October samples. At BF the individual species showed very different trends from each other. Comparison of the control and experimental sites over the 6 month 'recovery period' found that the fauna appeared to have recovered from the efects of the dredging within 3 months, and few effects were visible 1 week after dredging. Although there were significant differences in some faunal parameters at all sampling times, these differences were probably due to natural variation.
European data infrastructure with broad catalog discovery, free evaluation access and production-grade API options.
190K+
indexed dataset pages
32
countries and EU institutions
2019
API-first since
Free API quota
for evaluation and prototypes
SLA
history and push on production APIs
FAQ

Questions before production use

Practical answers on evaluation, licensing, freshness, versioning and support.

api.store is built and operated by Apitalks s.r.o. Company details and a direct contact path are linked in the footer for vendor checks and procurement review.
Yes. Selected APIs include a free API quota, so your team can validate coverage, freshness, response shape and workflow fit before asking for a production plan.
Often yes, but usage rights depend on the source license and dataset. We surface source, license and update metadata where available, and can help review terms before a production integration.
Maintained APIs include update metadata where available. For production integrations, we can add history, monitoring and push updates so changes are easier to detect and act on.
Production APIs can add SLA, stable identifiers, versioning support, history, push updates and direct support around the data your product or AI workflow depends on.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

European data discovery with free evaluation access and production-grade API options.

Copyright © 2026. Made by Apitalks